Printing Strategies

Getting size and resolution right:

Getting bit-mapped Images printed at the correct scale and resolution has been a pain for me since my bit-mapped image editor (L-View Pro) is not good in this area.  I found that I had the easiest time by embedding the bit-mapped graphical files into MS Word documents and then printing the documents.  (All word processors these days are quite good at incorporating graphics so non-Word users are likely to find this a good approach in their word processors as well.)

Here is the math:

       Word's printing drivers assume that an embedded picture (scaled at 100%)  is intended to be printed at 96 dots-per-inch. 

       I wanted 4 times better resolution than this, so I set up my bit-mapped graphics files so that they were 4 times 96 dots-per-inch, that is 384 dots-per-inch (152 dots-per-cm). 

       After each graphic file was embedded into Word as a picture, I scaled the picture to 25%. 

       The only way to keep this all straight was to include an "Inch by cm" rectangle like the following in each file that I printed:

       This was originally created in Visio as a one inch by one cm rectangle. (In Visio, the actual measurements are displayed on the status-line.)  

       The drawings were exported from Visio (saved as) GIF-files.  There is a parameter in this operation where you can set the pixels per inch.  I used 384 pixels per inch.  Therefore the export drivers built a bit map for this rectangle that was 384 pixels by 152 pixels.  (For Visio, the boundary of the rectangle is only half-included – ie, one of the black edges is part of the 384 pixels but not the other.)

       In each graphic file, I checked this by using the rectangle-selection tool to select the rectangle's pixels and read out on the status line that the selected area was indeed 384 pixels by 152 pixels. 

       After embedding the file into Word (and rescaling its size to 25%), I turned rulers on and scrolled the document so that the rectangle was right next to the ruler so I could verify that the rectangle was exactly one inch long. 

       After printing, I got out a real ruler and double-checked one more time. 

Two-sided Printing:

Often, both sides of a one-sheet thickness model-part show in a model.  Wouldn't it be nice if the back side of the part was colored? 

It turns out that this is quite easy to do with today's printers (even cheapo HP-inkjets like mine) by doing two-sided printing. 

Okay, to print a two-sided sheet, you need:

       Two graphics files - one for the front-side and one for the back-side.  (See below for what I used for the rebuilding of the Krakus.) 

       The back-side graphics file must be horizontally flipped from the front-side. 

       The printer will never exactly register the two printing passes, so the back-side image must be colored "outside of the lines" to compensate for the slight registration errors. 

         In my HP printer, the top-of-the-page registration is excellent.

         But the side-to-side registration can be off by up to 1 mm.  If it is really off, just print it again because it appears to be random!

       You have to center the front-side picture and the back-side picture on the page so that they register.  Word helps with this chore a lot:

         When you insert the graphics-files into the word document there are two ways that the pictures can be embedded into the page:  The picture can float over the page or it can be embedded (like a great big character) right in a line of text.  

         Choose to embed each picture like a great big character within a line of text.  (On newer versions of Word:  Format Picture: Layout: Advanced… In Line With Text)

         Place each picture as the top line on the page with no other chars.  Specify centered-text for that line.  (Format Paragraph: Alignment = Centered)

       When printing, you have to know how to insert the once-printed sheet for the second pass.  For almost all printers the rule is: HEAD IN, FACE UP.

For rebuilding the Krakus, I had two two-sided sheets: one printed on card-stock (1/3mm) and one printed on thin (1/10mm) paper.  Here are the graphics files so that you can see the techniques.  

(The images are shown in reduced scale;
Click on the images to see actual sheets at 4-times resolution.)