This position-by-position report on the Pittsburgh
Pirates organization attempts to project the level
that each player will be at in 2001 and identify the extent
to which a player is a prospect. In addition, it attempts
to identify which positions the Pirates have needs to fill and the
various possibilities to address those needs.
Notes: when you see ###/###/### that stands for
BA/OBP/SLG. The ages listed for players are how old they will be on July 1, 2001.
The standard information provided for each player (where available) is as follows:
Age, birthdate mm/dd/yy; how acquired (Draft Round # and year, Free Agent,
NonDrafted Free Agent, Draft & Follow), High School or College
Position, Bats-Throws, Height Weight
I'll list the players
currently in the organization based generally on the highest level they
played in 2000 (or where they spent most of the year or where they finished).
I'll include winter league stastics also (when they are available).
Other Prospect Sites/Links
You can find current stats on Pirate farm hands (in season) at various
web sites. You can find links to these sites in the
Minor League
section of Glenn's Pirates Page. USA Today, CNN, Nando, and Pirateball are all good
resources for information.
Not available for 2001
1996 Baseball America Prediction
1997 Baseball America Prediction
1998 Baseball America Prediction
1999 Baseball America Prediction
2000 Baseball America Prediction
After the season, Baseball America listed the Top 10 Pirate prospects for each season from
1983-2000.
This information is now reserved for their web subscribers.
Baseball Weekly: here's their
2001
look at the Pirates Prospects.
Nearly Ready: Alex Hernandez, Tike Redman
Up and Coming: Bobby Bradley, Sean Burnett, J.J. Davis, J.R. House, Jack
Wilson, Chris Young
Sleepers: Tony Alvarez, Jose Castillo, Craig Wilson, Dave Williams
An explanation of Mark's method:
One area where it
gets dicey is trying to compare young prospects with little pro
experience and high upside to more advanced prospects with
lower upside. The more experienced the player, the more data I
have to make a prediction, therefore the more confident I am in
my projection. Conversely, for some young prospects (who
typically have high upsides) I obviously have less data to work
with, so I'm not as confident in my projections (i.e. my
success rate in projecting prospects at lower levels is less
than that of prospects at higher levels). So sometimes I rate
someone with lower upside over a higher upside player simply
because I'm more confident in the low upside player's
projections. Other times, the young prospect's upside is just
too great and I've convinced myself that the player's potential
will be realized. Your mileage may vary.
Is there something here you like, that needs to be changed,
or would you like to see something that is not included?
Send me an
e-mail
Go back to Glenn's Home Page