This is a position-by-position report on the Pittsburgh
Pirates organization. It attempts to project the level
that each player will be at in 1997 and identify the extent
to which a player is a prospect. In addition, it attempts
to identify which positions the Pirates have needs and the
various possibilities to address those needs. In evaluating
batters, a major criterion will be age, as batters tend to
peak at ages 27-28 and then decline. Another heavily discussed
criterion will be the ability of the batter to take a walk;
drawing walks tends to be a very stable ability (it doesn't
vary much from year to year) and usually is the key factor
between a poor On Base Percentage (OBP) and a good OBP. I'll
harp a lot on OBP because
I see that as the Pirates major offensive problem (compared to
the league their OBP is relatively worse than their Slugging (SLG)).
Notes: when you see ###/###/### that stands for
BA/OBP/SLG (or
just OBP/SLG sometimes). The ages listed for players are
how old they will be in 1997.
I'll list players
currently in the organization based on the highest level they
played in 1996.
- Pitchers
- Catchers
- First Basemen
- Second Basemen
- Third Basemen
- Short Stops
- OutFielders
Mike Emeigh writes a monthly recap on the Bucs for
Online Drive. You can see Mike's column starting with the May 1996 edition.
I found another web-based Bucco Scouting report.
Sean
Forman provides another look at Pirate Prospects.
A Fantasy
Baseball site provides a good pre-season wrap-up on the Bucs.
In their late February 1997 issue (on sale through March 2),
Baseball America lists
the Pirates Top 10 Prospects. They are listed below. Additionally,
Baseball America has rated seven Bucco prospects in their Top 100 Prospects
List (Benson #8, Hermansen #21, Guillen #24, Ramirez #26, Wright #48, Nunez
#69, Anderson #88); this is the MOST prospects listed for any Major League
organization. Finally, Baseball America selected the Pirates Farm System
as the BEST of all 28 organizations. The future for this ball team is
very bright.
Baseball America's Top Ten Pirate Prospects for 1997:
- Kris Benson, RHP
- Chad Hermansen, ShortStop
- Jose Guillen, Outfield
- Aramis Ramirez, Third Base
- Ron Wright, First Base
- Abraham Nunez, Short Stop
- Lou Collier, Short Stop
- Jimmy Anderson, Left Handed Pitcher
- Elvin Hernandez, Right Handed Pitcher
- Charles Peterson, Outfield
Glenn's comment:
I don't know how they excluded TJ Staton from their list.
While listing the best tools in the Pirates system, Baseball
America came up with this list:
- Best Hitter for Average: Trey Beamon
- Best Power Hitter: Ron Wright
- Fastest Base Runner: Abraham Nunez
- Best Defensive Catcher: Lee Evans
- Best Defensive Infielder: Abraham Nunez
- Best Infield Arm: Lou Collier
- Best Defensive Outfielder: Freddy May
- Best Outfield Arm: Jose Guillen
- Best Fastball: Kris Benson
- Best Breaking Ball: Jimmy Anderson
- Best Control: Elvin Hernandez
Finally, here is Baseball America's prediction for the 2000
Pirate Line Up. There are a few positions where I disagree with
them, but they provide a good list to get a discussion going.
- Catcher: Jason Kendall
- First Base: Ron Wright
- Second Base: Abraham Nunez
- Third Base: Aramis Ramirez
- Shortstop: Chad Hermansen
- Left Field: Al Martin
- Center Field: Jermaine Allensworth
- Right Field: Jose Guillen
- Starting Pitcher: Kris Benson
- Starting Pitcher: Jason Schmidt
- Starting Pitcher: Jimmy Anderson
- Starting Pitcher: Elvin Hernandez
- Starting Pitcher: Esteban Loaiza
- Closer: Jose Silva
1996 Baseball America Prediction
An explanation of Mark's method:
One area where it
gets dicey is trying to compare young prospects with little pro
experience and high upside to more advanced prospects with
lower upside. The more experienced the player, the more data I
have to make a prediction, therefore the more confident I am in
my projection. Conversely, for some young prospects (who
typically have high upsides) I obviously have less data to work
with, so I'm not as confident in my projections (i.e. my
success rate in projecting prospects at lower levels is less
than that of prospects at higher levels). So sometimes I rate
someone with lower upside over a higher upside player simply
because I'm more confident in the low upside player's
projections. Other times, the young prospect's upside is just
too great and I've convinced myself that the player's potential
will be realized. Your mileage may vary.
Is there something here you like, that needs to be changed,
or would you like to see something that is not included?
Send me an
e-mail
Go back to Glenn's Home Page