|
Tabernacles, the Vatican, Catholic Politicians (and the JFK Legacy, sheesh) by Kelly Clark the lady in the pew January 17, 2003 The newly released Vatican document, Doctrinal Note On Some Questions Regarding the Participation of Catholics in Political Life, received a sadly predictable reaction from presidential wanna-be Senator John Kerry, one-time presidential wanna-be Senator Ted Kennedy, and others. Theyre not impressed. The document states, in part, that those who are directly involved in lawmaking bodies have a grave and clear obligation to oppose any law that attacks human life. For them, as for every Catholic, it is impossible to promote such laws or to vote for them. But the senators and others chose to adhere, not to the teachings of the Church, but instead to the The Great Kennedy Legacy, to which they remain staunchly and steadfastly loyal. Ill tell you more about The Great Kennedy Legacy in a second (okay, in a few minutes) but first: Let me tell you about a church I visited last Saturday!!! Whenever I visit a church new to me, my first question is: Wheres the tabernacle? This is, I believe, a reasonable question. Why? Because in so many Catholic churches, Ive discovered, finding the tabernacle is no easy task. It could be anywhere! It could be off to the side somewhere, or downstairs, or in a closet one never knows. So rather than meandering around, looking like the clueless person I, in fact, am, Ive found it prudent just to ask right up front. And so, when I visited Saint Jeromes Catholic Church in Weymouth, Massachusetts last Saturday, I posed my usual question. Imagine my surprise when I was directed to the main altar! Who wouldve thunk it? I was thrilled! Im always thrilled to see the tabernacle behind, or at least reasonably nearby, the main altar. I visit Stamford, Connecticut once a year, and the high point of my week-end is Mass at Saint John the Evangelist Church. The tabernacle is in clear view, right behind the main altar, its red lamp burning brightly. You cant miss it! And everybody the altar servers, the folks entering the church, the celebrants, the readers unfailingly genuflect before it. Before Mass, and during Mass, and after Mass. No uncertainty there! But Saint Johns in Stamford and Saint Jeromes in Weymouth are, Ive found, rarities, among parish churches, anyway. Shrines, such as Saint Clements Eucharistic Shrine, Saint Anthonys Shrine, and Saint Francis Chapel all in Boston dont seem to have a problem with Jesus in clear view. But as a rule, in parish churches, Jesus in the tabernacle has been, well, displaced. Now, Im sure there are many wise and theologically inspired ways to explain why tabernacles have been moved to out-of-the-way, hard-to-find nooks and crannies. I seem to recall something about the presence of the Real Presence sorta taking away from the miracle of the Transubstantiation at the Consecration. You wouldnt know that if you attended Mass at, for example, Saint Johns in Stamford. At the moments of elevation, bells peal resoundingly. And the ensuing silence is almost achingly profound. So, I dont quite get it this taking away, stuff. But Im not here to argue liturgical fine points. I just know what I view from the pew. And what I see is sometimes, if not appalling, then at least confusing. People are ignoring God. Or just missing Him! In my parish church, Jesus is reserved in an exquisitely beautiful place called, appropriately enough, the Blessed Sacrament Chapel. Parishioners know this, and, upon entering the church, generally head straight for the chapel for a few moments of silent adoration. Thats fine, if youre a parishioner. The problems creep up when folks are unfamiliar with the territory. Which is a considerable population in my parish church, since it happens to be the Mother Church of the Archdiocese. In my mind, Ive sorta divided them into three lose groups: A: The I-havent-been-here-before-but-attend-Mass-regularly folks These people frequently head for a large tabernacle directly in front of a side altar, and they kneel before it. I silently applaud this gesture, especially since there arent any kneelers there. Unfortunately, the reserved Sacrament isnt kept there either. I know, I know, the lack of a sanctuary lamp should indicate this, but cmon, give these folks a break. Their hearts are in the right place. If it seems appropriate, a gentle parishioner may (gently) direct the visitor toward the Blessed Sacrament Chapel: information that is always received with gratitude. B: The I-havent-been-to-Mass-for-a-spell-but-what-the-heck-lets-see-whats-going-on group These folks tend to make their way down the aisle with a great deal of uncertainty. When they finally decide where to sit, they either perform what I call a half-genuflection vaguely toward the main altar (or, in the case of some of the ladies, make a little curtsy) before taking a pew. See, I dont think theyre exactly sure what the rules are anymore. When they were kids, they were probably taught to genuflect before taking their seats. Now With All The Changes in The Church These Days, they feel like actors without a script. I ache for Group B folks. C: The Okay-lets-check-out-the-architecture-and-furnishings crowd Group C folks arent uncertain at all. Theyre there to look at the windows and what not. Since the Blessed Sacrament Chapel is so beautiful, its on their list of what to see in Boson, and they usually stride right in without so much as a how-dee-do to Jesus, chattering about the wall color or some such. Theyre there for the culture, not for the Christ. Thats bad enough, but you know whats worse, to my way of thinking? Nobody says anything about it. Nobody whispers something like: Excuse me, but Jesus Christ is present, and while Im glad you think the chapel is pretty, can you keep your voices down? I dont know. Its almost as if Jesus the Real Presence of Jesus Christ were talking about here doesnt really matter much. Uh, Kelly? What does this have to do with Catholic politicians? EVERYTHING!!!! Well, maybe not everything. But a great deal, I think. Heres my reasoning: If people arent regularly exposed to Jesus in the Blessed Sacrament; if they dont actually witness celebrating priests, deacons, altar servers, lectors, and their fellow worshippers reverently, lovingly, and frequently showing their adoration of Jesus, how can we expect others to emulate this adoration? And if the existence of Jesus Christ is apparently so inconsequential that it usually takes a road map to find him, then, gee: How can we expect politicians or ordinary Catholics, for that matter to take what His Vicar on Earth has to say all that seriously? The Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity of Jesus Christ, present in the tabernacle, isnt called the Bread of Heaven for nothing, friends. But many of us just arent seeing that. We walk into our churches and many of us, anyway chat with our friends about earthly concerns. We receive Holy Communion an act that miraculously places us in sublime intimacy with Jesus Christ and a few minutes later were back chatting with our friends about earthly concerns. Which brings me back to The Great Kennedy Legacy. When Senators Kerry et al speak about The Great Kennedy Legacy, theyre not exactly talking about The Peace Corps. Or college desegregation. Or even witty press conferences, Camelot, or Marilyn Monroe breathing Happy Birthday Mister President. And you can forget about asking not what your country can do for you, etc., etc. Were talking about a campaign promise. Were talking about what a Catholic senator on the campaign trail said to a group of protestant ministers way back in 1960. Heres a paraphrase: Hey revs! Im not taking any orders from any Pope, so please, please, dont be squeamish about you and your flocks voting for me for president, just on accounta Im a Catholic, okay? Eschewing Rome, Catholic politicians, and the Catholic people in and out of the pews who support them clutch firmly to their collective bosoms the notion that being liked here on earth is the be-all and end-all. They respect the teachings of the Vatican. But they crave the approval of their voters far more. And if the voters whether they call themselves Catholic or not want abortion on demand, euthanasia, free condoms and birth control pills for high-schoolers, the death penalty, and homosexual marriage, why, then I guess the Vatican and Christ Himself will have to take a back seat. While respecting the Vatican, Senator Kerry venerates the lasting legacy of President Kennedy. What about the lasting legacy of Jesus Christ, I wonder? At least Congressman Stephen Lynch is honest about the whole thing. When I sought election to this office, he said yesterday, I did accept the inevitability that the path to being a good Catholic and the path to being a good congressman might at times diverge. Lynch added: My hope is that these instances will be rare. How about praying, instead, that these instances be non-existent? In front of the tabernacle? Presuming, of course, that it can be found. And now for the fine print: Kelly Clark is your basic nobody. She serves on no parish councils, belongs to none of the myriad of designer-chic "Catholic" groups, or any Catholic group, for that matter, other than the Roman Catholic Church. Holding no theology degrees, she has no desire so see herself or any of her sex wearing a clerical collar. She figures Jesus knew what He was doing when He established His Church, and also figures that its His Church, not hers, and not yours. Shes an ordinary parishioner of Cathedral of the Holy Cross, Boston. Use the links on the left to e-mail Kelly, to visit her parish, read past columns, and check out other cool stuff. Copyright: Kelly Clark, 2003. I dont care if you share this stuff with others. In fact, I hope you do! Only Id appreciate it if youd link me, or print it off as it is. In other words, dont change anything. Thanks. The Lady in the Pew column is updated weekly, God willing. To be notified of updates, please e-mail me. The links on the left. Mary, Mother of God, pray for us. Mary, Mother of the Church, pray for us.
|
||