|
The New TV Season: Better Than Christmas
Rating: Excitable!
The air is a little fresher.
The birds sing a little sweeter. There is an inexplicable spring in my
step as I sniff said air and smile at said twittering birds. Considering I live
in Los Angeles, you bet your ass I’m high on something if I’m feeling that way.
So what is the cause of this infection of joy I am feeling? Why, it is
September my friends. The time of year when Television programming returns with
a vengeance and my DVR begins to burst at its virtual seams. The networks are
setting up their new toys, eager to share them with the other kids. Few will
survive, and likely fewer actually deserve to survive. The slate this year has
some interesting plots and some promising entries. So before the viewings commence,
let us do some Fall season egocentric forecasting.
Show Most Likely to be
the Biggest New Hit: “Pushing
Daisies” – For the crisp, beautiful cinematography alone this show should draw a bit of a crowd. The premise is fresh and the marketing is non-stop.
Ironically scheduled against the least creative show on television (“Deal or No Deal” or as I call it “Let’s
Make a Deal: The Goatless Briefcase Years”), it has little competition for that niche of viewer. The fact that crimes are solved also provides a solid foundation in this CSI and procedural mad TV landscape.
Show I Most Didn’t
Know I Wanted to Watch: “Carpoolers”
– Bruce McCulloch created this? Seriously?
I’m in. He is worth the heartbreak of cancellation. I just hope it is funnier than the previews I have seen so far.
Show Most Likely to Be
The Most Critically Hyped Show I Hate: “Dirty, Sexy, Money” - If pretentiousness had a smell, I would be on olfactory overload. What does dirt, sex and money smell like anyway? I’m
betting at least 3 of you had Courtney Love as your answer. And I’m as
interested in her as I am in this show.
Show Most Likely to Inspire
My Obsession: “Reaper”
– There is an air of silliness and quirkiness to this. It is reminiscent
of “Brimstone’s” premise but with 98% less brooding. It also
has a dash of “Good v. Evil” I think as well. Now let’s get
Clayton Rohner in a cameo!
Show Most Likely to Disappoint
Me: “Chuck”
– I want to like this so badly, but I fear that it can not possibly live up to expectations. Although Adam Baldwin certainly eases the pain.
Show I Most Want to See
but Will Not Because of Competitive Scheduling: TIE: “Aliens in America” and “The Big Bang Theory” - “Aliens” has a nice quiet buzz going. The catch is that it not only airs opposite geektastic “The Big Bang Theory” but it also airs
concurrent with “Prison Break” and “Chuck.” For extra
fun, bull in china shop “Dancing with the Stars” also shares the same timeslot.
Cruelty, they name is network scheduling!
Show With Biggest Déjà
vu: “Moonlight”
– A show briefly helmed by David Greenwalt (he dropped out) about a Vampire detective in the big city. Wait, what?!? This sounds vaguely familiar. Hmmm. I’m not sure why, but it makes me think of “Bones” actually. I wonder why?
British Crossover Waste
of a Time: “Viva Laughlin”
– It seems like every year there is a cross the pond update to a popular British television show. And like (almost) always, this looks like another miserable failure.
Honorable mention goes to the midseason replacement “The I.T. Crowd.”
I’m sad to report I have seen the pilot and it is unbearable. It
is the kind of unfunny that feels like someone smacked you across the face with a madlib filled out by a fifth grader.
British Crossover Waste
of Talent: “Journeyman” – Can I just say how much
I resent actors from England, Ireland, and Scotland coming over to America to star in our shows and NOT use their normal accents? Most frustrating is in newcomer “Journeyman,” which stars Kevin McKidd
SANS his Scottish accent. Why would you do that?
Why? McKidd is a sensational talent, but I can not help but feel slighted
that he will be throwing out his accent for the show. Can a girl get a Scottish
accent up in here?
Show That Owes Its Existence
to TiVo: “Cavemen”
– The beauty of the DVR is that you can skip the commercials. Well, one
of the beauties anyway. However, that power comes with a price; advertising must
make its way in somehow. Because there is a yin and yang to the universe, our
gift of commercial skipping must be offset with a commercial derived television show.
I guess it is only fair. Still, I get the uneasy feeling that this could
be the heir to the still mystifyingly popular “3rd Rock from the Sun.”
Show Most Likely to Make
Me Sweat the Ratings: TIE: “Friday Night Lights” and “30
Rock” – okay I cheated since neither is a new show. But with
the ratings these shows had last year, they pretty much are new to the vast majority of the television watching public. And the possibility that either will be cancelled this season gives me night terrors
to be quite honest.
Next up? The returning
shows. I out my guilty pleasures and rant about the worst scheduled night in
television (HINT: it begins in THUR and ends in AY.)
|
 |
 |
 |
CW: Don't Fear the Network
Reaper
Rating: 4
There are moments in a TV watcher’s viewing life that one
remembers. That night where a plot twist takes you by surprise and makes you
high five the person next to you. The time when you laughed so hard that your
stomach was sore the next day and you could barely drive your car. Then there
is that magic moment when you watch a pilot for a show and you know, deep down that something very special has just happened. Something wonderful has entered your life. That
is it is love. And you, a faithful, loyal TV watcher know that eventually this
love will end in heartbreak.
For me all three moments happened with “Buffy the Vampire Slayer,” “Freaks & Geeks,” and
“Veronica Mars.” Those shows made me smile and made me euphoric. Weeks became just counting down until the next installment. The root of TV obsession is a good TV show. And this addict
was seriously in need of a new fix. Enter “Reaper.”
“Reaper” is the age old story of sweet slacker boy whose soul was sold to the devil by his parents. Now before you judge his parents too harshly, please note the circumstances under
which this deal was forged. The father, deathly ill, was spared by the devil
in exchange for the soul of their first born. The couple made the deal, fully
expecting to never have children. Then with added input from the family doc that
the father was infertile, they thought nothing of the deal and went about living their lives.
But as countless people can tell you thanks to drunken nights, dark backseats, and late exit strategies, the best laid
plans of men don’t always end conception free. Such was the fate of Mr.
and Mrs. Oliver who popped out little Sam. On his 21st birthday the
devil comes for his contractual gains. Father Oliver explains the history to
Sam, and Sam learns from the devil what this deal means exactly.
As the devil’s employee, Sam is expected to collect the escaped souls from hell and return them to the nearest
hell portal. Satan explains that any place that feels like hell on Earth actually
is hell on Earth. Well, a portal anyway.
As you may well expect, this means the local DMV. While that may be an
old joke, the payoff for me was hysterical. (Anytime something goes wrong in
my life I will now shake my fists to the heavens and mutter “DMV!” Thanks
to Tyler Labine as Sock for making this spectacular line delivery.) Anyway, the
wonderful Ray Wise does a beautiful job walking that fine line between being devilishly charming and wickedly threatening. Often he does this with the same smile on his face.
Wise is brilliant in the role. Even when he says things like “I
can be nice!” it sounds like a threat.
Though Sam is reluctant to do the Devil’s bidding he is warned that forfeiture of his soul means that his mother’s
soul is taken instead. Sam, nice son that he is, accepts his fate, even going
so far as to tell his mother that the devil set him free from the deal after she begs Sam to let the Devil have her soul instead. With little choice, Sam attempts to finish his first assignment. With the aid of his buddy Sock (and decked out in the line of clothing the Ghostbusters animated series
rejected), they hunt down a firebug intent on burning down an elementary school. Satisfied
that he is doing good in some way, Sam settles into his new role.
The writing on this show is funny and unexpectedly realistic in a way. The
fact that some slacker guy has telekinesis and is a bounty hunter for Beelzebub part not so much, but the dialogue, in a lot
of ways is very real. The characters are a nice mix of likeable and flawed. More importantly, the cast all around is perfect.
Bret Harrison as Sam Oliver gives a relaxed comedic delivery (far less manic than his “Grounded for Life”
years) and is generally very likeable. Likewise Tyler Labine is just as fantastic
as ever. Although I was one of the few people who liked “Invasion,”
I can tell you that I think a sizable part of that sprang from how much I just liked Labine’s performance on that show. Labine has a very natural delivery that seems less like acting and more like just
being the character. He does a beautiful job of being likeable and yet an ass. The other new show dealing with a nerdy guy with powers “Chuck” has a
character like Sock called Morgan played by Joshua Gomez. The difference is that
I don’t know if I would want to hang out with Morgan, but slacker Sock however I could totally hang out with. Even though that would likely mean I would end up calling him an ass at least twice during any conversation
with that character. Such is the greatness of Labine.
This is by far the best new show of the season
so far. Granted I am only half way through but I think the networks would be
hard pressed to come out with anything as fresh and fun as “Reaper.” Even
more exciting, the pilot was directed by Kevin Smith and the show was created (and the pilot written by) two women. Add to that the talents of Tom Spezialy and Mark Gordon and you just have an incredible hour of television. The fact that it will likely languish on CW like “Veronica Mars” is a
heartbreak indeed, but hope springs eternal. Hopefully this time will be different. Hopefully it will be discovered. And
I for one sincerely hope you discover it with me. Good shows are not nearly as
fun if you have no one to rhapsodize over them with you.
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
ABC:
Carpoolers
Cavemen
Dirty Sexy Money
Private Practice
CBS:
The Big Bang Theory
Kid Nation
NBC:
Journeyman
CW:
K-Ville
Back to You
Rating: 2
This show feels like a genetic cross breeding of “Frasier”
and “Anchorman: the Later Years.” Kelsey Grammer plays Chuck Darling,
a superstar news anchor who burned through his life and his co-workers on the way to the top.
After an incident where he lets rip a 4 letter stacked tirade on air by accident, he is fired and returns to his roots
in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Life has gone on in his absence, with almost all
of the old news crew still haunting the set. In particular, former co-anchor
Kelly (Patricia Heaton) is less than thrilled to have him back at her side. Kelly
explains away her gruffness as just not liking him. Meanwhile, sports guy Fred
Willard theorizes that she resents him stealing her spotlight and relieving her as the star of the show. In truth, Kelly’s grudge began when Chuck impregnated her on his last night in town 10 years ago.
Chuck reels at the revelation but ultimately seems to take the situation to heart. Kelly
does not regret her daughter, and Chuck seems to be just as pleased with the existence of his offspring. The daughter is seen as a joy to both parents, and this is one thing the show gets right.
Created by Steve Levitan (“Stacked,” “Just Shoot Me”) and Christopher Lloyd (“Frasier,”
“Wings”), this show, like all of Levitan’s shows is a mixed bag. One
gets three laugh out loud moments with long groan filled silences in between. The
cast puts on the hard sell but I just can’t bring myself to buy it. Even
the non-sequiter spouting Willard can’t make this a repeat viewing show for me.
The set is “Newsradio” reminiscent, as are the characters and jokes.
It feels a lot like a mash up of shows.
The flashbacks to Chuck’s days 10 years ago are great but they seem far more distant that they are supposed to
be. They have more of a 1970’s feel to them. After those funny moments, the show seems to cruise downhill. With
a cast who can deliver a punchline with comedic ease, it could have potential. Ty
Burrell in particular is quite funny. However, this show doesn’t feel like
it is really all that worth the effort. Even if it does improve.
|
 |
|
|
|